Suggestions
on How to Improve Respondent Cooperation
3
key tenets of respondent cooperation
- Offer
confidentiality/privacy
-
Show the respondent respect
-
Answer respondent's questions honestly
General
guideline
- Questionnaires
should be set-up to be time efficient
- Respect
for the respondent
- Explanations
for request for personal information
Questionnaire
Intros
- Clear
concise identification of purpose and who is doing the interview
- State
reason for call as being marketing research and topic of survey
- State
no selling involved
- State
respondents confidentiality/privacy respected
- State
monitoring/recording statement (if used) and/or verbal approval
from respondent *note: varies by state
- Give
length of interview
- Encourage
participation
Questionnaire
Closings
- Always
thank the respondent
- State
briefly the benefits of marketing research
- Mention
possible call back possible for verification
- Answer
honestly any questions respondent has
Interviewers
Play a Key Role
- Knowledgeable
about their research and interviewing
- Polite
- Be
interested in the respondent
- Sensitivity
to physically challenged and minorities
- Allow
respondent to answer "don't know" or refusal to answer
- Permit
interview termination without "harassing" them
- Thank
the respondent
Company
Managers Play a Key Role Too
- Convey
the importance of respondent cooperation interviewers and supervisors
-
Work with clients to find ways to improve respondent cooperation
- Train
interviewers to be knowledgeable
- Evaluate
the need for incentives due to interview length
- Present
written information to respondents in a professional manner
- Keep
respondent areas looking professional
- Provide
means of educating the public about the benefits of opinion and
marketing research
- Conduct
validations in professional and non-antagonizing manner to respondent
- Consider
the respondent's point of view in everything you do
Remember
to ensure all respondents have a positive experience through the
professionalism of the interviewer.
Copyright©
2000, 2001, 2002 by Marketing Research Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
|